Thursday, October 18, 2007

A Controversy of Style

Within the last decade there has been an ongoing argument between teams that play "good" rugby and "bad" rugby. This controversy is directly related to teams' usage of their forwards and backs.

"Good" rugby is the classical rugby style that involves more finesse among the backs and a great fitness level for players. The emphasis is on ball control and strategy. Forwards are used to retain the ball while backs complete offensive moves.

"Bad" rugby is a recent development within the sport calling for larger players that do not have as much fitness and do not play smartly, simply running into the opposing team and being as brutal as they can. Forwards are used as the main offense, crashing the ball constantly. This type of rugby, ironically, leads to fewer points as players cannot run and pass well enough to score tries and are forced to kick drop-goals for points.

This is not to say that rugby players may not be large and strong, but rather that they should have a firm commitment to fundamentals such as passing and running.

Going into the finals the South Africa has used the qualities of "good" rugby while England have been guilty of subscribing to "bad" rugby techniques. Springbok Coach Eddie Jones says, "'At the end of the day I love rugby, and I don't particularly like the way it's been played over the last three or four years". Sports writer Wynne Gray of the New Zealand Herald says that Jones' is critical of "Bash, grunt and kick rugby" because it has not enhanced the sports' image.

Others, including the French national team, recently knocked out of the tournament say that they want South Africa to win "because their style of play is more spectacular than England. " As another sports writer for the Herald writes of the French players,

"They believe a South African win is vital for the health of the sport in general, and the World Cup in particular, with the English side having come under fire for their reliance on force rather than flair."

Rugby is a sport of dominance, but it is also a sport of friendship. Teams will generally play hard against each other and then hold social events after the games. If teams continue to use "bad" rugby techniques, however, this amity may disappear. Lets play good rugby and keep it a sport "played by gentlemen".

10 comments:

How to increase penis size pills said...

This controversy is directly related to teams' usage of their forwards and backs....bad news for all!!

Natural breast enhancement pills said...

It will take time for me to get the whole thing in my mind about "A Controversy of Style".

Best penis enlargement device review said...

Not many people in the rugby community would have predicted that England

Male Extra penis augmentation pills said...

"Its a spots of dominance" well said. Controversy of style discourage people sometimes.

Maxocum increase low sperm count pills said...

like your controversial post . keep it up .

VigRXPlus increase penis size pills said...

This is not to say that rugby players may not be large and strong...

How to increase penis size said...

"Bad" rugby is a recent development within the sport calling for larger players that do not have as much fitness.

Best Washing Machine 2012 said...

is good for this post because now i know the difference between good rugby and bad rugby

M190va-Review said...

I like all the sports but rugby is just amazing. I hope that i will visit New-Zeeland in the near future so i can see the All Blacks.

As seen on TV said...

Your story is amazing sir. I think im going to take a day off and stay in the house reading your entire blog.