...I was looking at that punk cover of Akon's "I want to [ahem] love you" when I stumbled upon this series of albums where punk artists cover a predetermined genre. It's called "Punk Goes..." and I had heard of it, but didn't quite know the extent to which the albums had gone.
Anyway, as I was looking at one of the albums, I became quite confused. Here is a link to the page in question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
If you look at this list for a few moments it becomes obvious why I had trouble with it. For one thing--and this may just be me getting old, but a lot of these bands from the nineties are really just early versions of punk themselves. In other words, why get a punk artist to cover a punk artist? This is especially evident when the band (if you can call it that) "Plain-Terrible White T's," who claim to be covering "Song 2" by Blur. Really? Blur is the brit-pop equivalent of punk. And furthermore, "Song 2" is actually a faster, updated version (read: more punk) of an earlier song entitled "woo-hoo."
"Song 2" by Blur:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Pretty much punk anyway, right?
The second problem is that many of the bands are not only covering songs that may already be seen as "punk," but they aren't even close to punk themselves! Copeland's version of "Black Hole Sun" isn't punk (or good), because Copeland isn't punk at all (though good)!
"Black Hole Sun" by Soundgarden:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiSkyEyBczU
"Black Hole Sun" by Copeland:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYzHoGbo3ws
In short, it seems that that this "Punk Goes..." crap is just that: crap. If you have this CD and are an even half-way decent human being, do the world a favor and take it out back and bury the poor thing. It's the least you can do.